by
Shipscook
@ 2008-02-06 - 14:38:21
I just saw the headline story on Ch4's News at Noon.
The government's latest wheeze to deflect attention from the state of the economy and the continued support for Dubbya's illegal wars and insane foreign policy, is to urge the police to confiscate booze from underage drinkers in public. (Which they already have the power to do anyway if they believe the kids are going to drink it).
Now I don't actually think this is a too bad idea if it cuts down on booze fuelled crime and makes the streets a bit more pleasant for us folks, it will appeal to the Daily Mail readers, but I'm not sure that its been thought through.
Lets face it if the kids can manage to buy the stuff, they can find somewhere to drink it out of sight of the cops. This only drives the problem out of sight. I know why don't we just drive the problem complely underground so that some enterprising crim can bootleg booze to the kids.
Mind you I don't think we can blame the under 18's for most of this booze fuelled nastyness. I have seen four squad cars called out to one of the "nice" clubs with gentleman bouncers at a quarter past seven (I was on the way to the supermarket) to sort out a "disagreement" between perfectly legal drinkers and people driving down the high street hurling verbal abuse to passers by while necking Stella from a can. I'd like to see the sort of boozers that serve these idiots have their licences suspended or taken away and any idiot caught pissed in a car, banned for life.
I was also most amused to see that the government's thunder on this issue was stolen by the leaked Flanagan Report that revealed just how much Police time was wasted on form filling and the quite astonishing fact that imposing targets has resulted in arrests for the most trivial offences where a stiff talking to would have done (including an arrest for obstructing a public highway with a snowman) instead of dealing with real crimes that impact on people's lives that are a bit more complex to solve. Remember this is our money being wasted here in the pursuit of some management consultant's wet dreams.
Going back to the question of underage boozing I though Ch4 handled the interview with Jacqui Smith, the Home Secretary, pretty poorly, when asked about when as a mother she let her own kids have a taste of wine with Sunday lunch, she was allowed to get away with some prepared statement on the harm booze does young people, when the correct journalistic response would have been "With respect Home Secretary you have just avoided the question" and no matter what the response to run the broadcast with it.